Friday, April 26, 2019
Arguments about the critical period hypothesis Annotated Bibliography
Arguments about the unfavorable period hypothesis - Annotated Bibliography ExampleThe researchers were able to identify that this generalization is not completely true and that there are other factors involved. This research will be utilise to provide support for the opponent look of the argument that puberty and the age before puberty is the captious period to gain native akin proficiency in learning a second oral communication. In this research clause the author provides a commentary and definition of an individuals ability to speak a language in the uniform way a native user of that language speaks that language. In this article the author even states that the critical period hypothesis restricts the way researchers look at non-natives ability to learn a second language. This article will be used to define the concepts of nativelikeness as well as non-nativelikeness in relation to the example of these concepts in the critical period argument. This research was conducted o n Spanish subjects in order to identify the constraints they bewilder while gaining nativelike proficiency in learning a second language. The researchers were able to identify that there is a negative correlation between an individuals ability to learn a second language with nativelike proficiency and age even once the critical period has elapsed. This study will be used to argue against the critical period hypothesis and it will be used to support the point that non-natives expose to develop nativelike proficiency in using a language before as well as after the critical period.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment